"MODEL CALENDAR FOR DPCs
As per the DOP&T OM No. 22011/9.98-Estt.(D) dated September 8, 1998, the panels for promotion of officers should be drawn in such a way so that the recommended officers could be promoted soon after the vacancy becomes available. For that purpose, the administrative Ministries /Departments are required to send to the UPSC, DPC proposals complete with all relevant documents /information by July 15 of the year preceding vacancy year in case the vacancies are calculated on financial year basis and by April, 15 if the vacancies are calculated on calendar year basis. This time schedule is in respect of cases where approval of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) is required. In respect of non-ACC cases, complete proposals are required to be sent to the Commission by July 31 of the year preceding the vacancy year where the vacancies are calculated on financial year basis and by April 30 if the vacancies are calculated on calendar year basis. All existing and clear expected vacancies in the concerned grade as well as chain vacancies on account of retirement etc., in the higher grades which can be clearly anticipated in the same vacancy year should be reported to the DPC. It has further been provided that since the DPC would be convened in the year preceding the vacancy year, the DPC may have to consider some of the officers who are to retire in the vacancy year itself and there may also be similar other eventualities. Therefore, in order to have effective panels, DPC may have to provide for an extended panel subject to the parameters prescribed vide DOPO&T OM No.22011/18/87-Estt.(D) dated April 9, 1989."
Above is displayed on UPSC's web site and is placed here for perusal of all who read this blog. The above instructions regarding model calendar is not at all followed. The Association should insist the Board to follow the same in letter and spirit. Comments are invited.
i think the modrator should not publish basic rules. Everybody is aware of this but who has said the same should be followed by the administration. if it all the instructions were followed there would be smooth administration and no litigations in CAT.
ReplyDeletewhat is the fate of the comtiments given by the Board when the agitation was withdrawn 1) what is the fate of 1) The proposal for 2010-11 2) Civil list 3) posting of ACIT who were to be considered in the last order 3) DPC of DCIT to JCIT
ReplyDeleteThe moderator appears to have lost interest after the ito to acit order is out. He should continue to blog on the latest happenings in the matters of all officers, not restrict himself to ITO to ACIT. Let this platform be an opportunity to come out of the shell and express the views of IT officers and where the latest happenings are being updated.